Blood contamination scandal victims could get payouts of up to £2.6m each in compensation scheme that will start in October, government announces

Victims of the infected blood scandal could get payouts of up to £2.6million each after the government announced a new compensation scheme that will start in October.

The support scheme payments will also give those subjected to unethical research up to £15,000 extra under changes to a multibillion-pound compensation plan.

The cash installments - including for bereaved partners - will continue for life as part of the plan,the Government said,as it announced it had accepted the 'majority' of recommendations from an independent review.

Some affected people will also be given an increased 'social impact' award recognising of the consequences of stigma surrounding the disaster.

The Government has not put a figure on how much the scheme might cost overall,though awards for those at the top end are likely to exceed £2.5 million.

More than 3,000 have died and many continue to suffer after tens of thousands of vulnerable patients were infected with HIV and hepatitis from contaminated blood products during the 1970s and early 1990s.

Blood vials containing personal messages from families affected by the infected blood scandal are seen today in a memorial installation within Methodist Central Hall

'We are disappointed,however,that the existing support schemes have not been opened more widely,including to people given hepatitis C after 1991 and those given hepatitis B.

Read More

How I broke the infected blood scandal in the face of cowardly politicians and bullying by the medical and legal establishment

'The Government must work transparently and openly with the infected blood community and explain its reasoning for likely compensation levels and the basis for these figures. Thousands of lives were forever altered when people were given hepatitis C and compensation must reflect that reality.'

A man whose father died in the infected blood scandal has said the announcement of support scheme payments for life for victims is a 'welcome step',but its documentation 'has caused some confusion' over how much people will receive.

Jason Evans,who was four years old when his father Jonathan died after contracting Hepatitis C and HIV from a blood product,told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'I think overall it's a welcome step that we're now getting closer to the actual delivery of the full compensation that people have obviously waited a long time for.

'I think the documentation that's been provided by the Government has caused some confusion - there's a lot of it,some of it's very detailed,and there's not one document which places all of the information in a single place where people can look at it and say,"this is how much I might get".

Read More

How doctors who infected patients with contaminated blood will never face justice

'So,there is some confusion but I think once you kind of get past all of that - which I think will take some time - it has to be a welcome step,I think,that the fighting for trying to get to this point is coming to an end and the challenge turns to actually delivering it.'

Des Collins,senior partner of Collins Solicitors who has advised more than 1,000 victims and families involved in the infected blood scandal,welcomed the provision for independent legal advice for victims but questioned the wait for those affected,compared to those infected.

He said: 'It is clearly good news that the scheme will be up and running by October and ready to receive applications from the infected,both those living and from representatives of those now deceased.

'It is somewhat surprising that those affected will need to wait longer than those infected to make an application but at least there is a guide on timescale.'

'The infected blood community are now assured of informed and independent legal support going forward which for many will be a great relief.'

Leigh Day,which represents more than 300 people affected by the infected blood scandal,said they 'cautiously' welcomed the announcement but criticised the failure to refer to 'the continued disparity in the proposals for funds awarded to those infected with mono-HIV versus mono-HCV infection.'

'The largest cohort within the infected blood community are those infected with HCV and our clients are disappointed that it appears that this long-fought against discrimination will continue,' they said.

Read More

'No sense of victory': Victims of the infected blood scandal say their whole lives have been overshadowed by agony as report vindicates them

Paymaster General and minister for the Cabinet Office Nick Thomas-Symonds said: 'This is an important milestone for victims and campaigners who have waited far too long for justice.

'The Government has listened to the recommendations from Sir Robert Francis KC,heard the strong calls for change from the community and acted.

'We are going to do everything possible to deliver compensation quickly,and in many cases deliver life-changing sums to people infected and affected by this scandal.

'We know no amount of compensation can fully address the damage to people who suffered as a result of this scandal. This is why alongside the compensation,we must drive forward the wider cultural changes to make sure nothing like this ever happens again.'

Conservative MP and shadow paymaster general John Glen,who helped establish the interim compensation of £210,000 under the last government,said the Labour Government 'have continued to listen to the concerns of the infected and affected communities'.

More potential paths to compensation will also be opened up,for example by allowing people who have health conditions that are not recognised by the 'core' route to make a personalised application.

However,some of Sir Robert's recommendations were rejected,including a proposal to uprate support payments beyond Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation.

Some 3,000 people across the UK are estimated to have registered interest with the compensation scheme.

NHS

Disclaimer: This article is reproduced from other media. The purpose of reprinting is to convey more information. It does not mean that this website agrees with its views and is responsible for its authenticity, and does not bear any legal responsibility. All resources on this site are collected on the Internet. The purpose of sharing is for everyone's learning and reference only. If there is copyright or intellectual property infringement, please leave us a message.
©copyright 2009-2020 Rubric News      Contact Us   SiteMap